One WELLBY is a one-point increase in wellbeing on a 0-10 scale, for one person, for one year (or equivalent).

A WELLBY (Wellbeing-Adjusted Life Year) measures how much an intervention or programme improves people’s overall wellbeing. Often, the measure used is life satisfaction.

What is a WELLBY?

What is a WELLBY?

When we think about transforming people’s lives, we often focus on physical health and wealth. But what about other important factors like freedom, relationships, or mental health? How do we measure these benefits in a meaningful way? This is where WELLBYs come in.

Standardised measures of health, such as QALYs (Quality-Adjusted Life Years), have been used for decades to prioritise healthcare resourcesQALYs have been researched for over 50 years and implemented in decision making since then (Spencer et al., 2022). Most prominently the UK’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) uses QALYs to identify whether medical interventions are cost-effective (“NICE says it generally considers that interventions costing the NHS less than £20,000 per QALY gained are cost effective and those costing up to £30,000 per QALY gained might, with certain conditions”; Ogden, 2017). This has a large influence on how the UK’s National Health Service spends (Rid et al., 2015)..

WELLBYs are a newer approachBrazier & Tsuchiya, 2015; Frijters et al., 2020; Layard & Oparina, 2021 which makes it possible to compare across the benefits or harms of a much wider set of interventions.

Think of it this way: if someone rates their life satisfaction as 5 out of 10, and an intervention helps them improve to a 6 out of 10 for 1 year, that’s worth 1 WELLBY for that person. 1 point × 1 year × 1 person = 1 WELLBY

How to calculate a WELLBY

Wellbeing increase1 points on a 0-10 scale
Years1 years the effect lasts
People1 people affected
WELLBYs1 WELLBY
Chart of wellbeing over three years: a person at 5 out of 10 rises to 6 for one year after an intervention, then returns to 5.

Why do WELLBYs matter?

Often, we want to make people better off – for instance, if we’re giving to charity or thinking about government policy. And, we want to know if we’re having an impact – or not. This means we need a way to measure impact.

At the moment, decision makers often look at objective indicators, like health, wealth or crime rates. But these don’t capture how people feel or experience life. And there’s no easy way to compare the impact between them. Say one option treats mental health and another reduces poverty. Which makes a bigger difference?

This is where WELLBYs come in.

The full picture

They capture how interventions affect people’s lives as a whole.

People’s own voice

They let people tell us directly how their lives are going, putting their experience at the centre of decision-making.

Compare anything

They make it possible to compare different types of programmes, and so decide where to invest resources.

See what others miss

They reveal effects that health, income and education measures miss, such as social cohesion, extra leisure time or the experience of unemployment.

How do we measure WELLBYs?

WELLBYs are based on measures of ‘subjective wellbeing’ – how people think and feel about their own lives; in simple terms, these are happiness surveys. Researchers typically ask simple questions like “Overall, how satisfied are you with your life nowadays?” with answers on a 0-10 scale.

Try it yourself

How satisfied are you with your life, all things considered?

0 = completely dissatisfied10 = completely satisfied

This might sound too simple to be meaningful, but decades of research show these measures are reliable, valid and comparable between people. Countries with more poverty, conflict, and instability consistently show lower life satisfaction scores, while those with better living conditions show higher scores (see the map below using the 2024 data from the Gallup World Poll – and lagging countries with missing data).

World map of life evaluations (on the Cantril Ladder scale, 0-10) by country, with lowest scores in Sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle East and highest in Europe, North America, and Australia. Cantril Ladder score (GWP) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Scroll sideways to see the whole chart.

Comparing charities with WELLBYs

Let’s look at some concrete examples. The Happier Lives Institute has compared a variety of approaches to help people living in low-income countries.

Using WELLBYs, we found that some interventions are much more cost-effective than others. Some charities are 100s if not 1000s of times more cost-effective than others. This includes some surprising, potentially counterintuitive findings such as psychotherapy produced about five times more wellbeing per dollar spent than cash transfers.

Dot plot of 27 interventions ranked by WELLBYs created per $1,000 donated. LMIC interventions dominate the top, led by Pure Earth (Ghana) (105.4), Taimaka (66.0), Friendship Bench (48.5), and StrongMinds (40.4). HIC interventions cluster near zero, and the least cost-effective charity in the sample, Football Beyond Borders, produces just 0.12 WELLBYs per $1,000 donated. 105.4 66.0 48.5 40.4 36.6 32.9 21.6 17.7 12.2 10.0 7.6 6.5 4.9 2.0 1.1 0.74 0.60 0.37 0.28 0.22 0.19 0.19 0.18 0.12 0.05 0.03 0.02 (LMIC) operates in low- or middle-income countries (HIC) operates in high-income countries Guide Dogs UK [Guide dogs for the blind] (HIC) Hypothetical homeless charity (2) [Housing for homeless] (HIC) Hypothetical homeless charity (1) [Cash transfers for homeless] (HIC) Football Beyond Borders [Mentoring, counselling, and exercise] (HIC) Walking with the Wounded Employment [Employment support] (HIC) Get Out Get Active [Exercise] (HIC) Free2B [LGBTQ+ youth mentoring] (HIC) The Wave Project [Mentoring and exercise] (HIC) Restoration Trust: Human Henge [Mental health support] (HIC) Factory International Schools Programme [Art engagement] (HIC) Walking with the Wounded Head Start [Mental health support] (HIC) Power2 Rediscovery [Youth mentoring] (HIC) Safe Soulmates [Community building] (HIC) London Youth Rowing’s Active Row [Exercise] (HIC) Parkrun [Exercise & volunteering] (HIC) Mandem Meetups [Community building] (HIC) GiveDirectly [Cash transfers] (LMIC) Action for Happiness [Happiness courses] (HIC) Royal Voluntary Service [Volunteering] (HIC) Tearfund [Religious community engagement] (LMIC) Fortify Health [Fortifying wheat flour with iron] (LMIC) Shamiri [Task-shifted group psychotherapy] (LMIC) ACTRA [CBT to reduce crime] (LMIC) StrongMinds [Task-shifted group psychotherapy] (LMIC) Friendship Bench [Task-shifted psychotherapy] (LMIC) Taimaka [Treating acute malnutrition for infants] (LMIC) Pure Earth (Ghana) [Advocacy for reducing lead exposure in cosmetics] (LMIC) 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 WELLBYs created per $1,000 donated Evaluator Happier Lives Institute Krekel and colleagues Pro Bono Economics State of Life Depth of analysis Shallow Medium In-depth

Scroll sideways to see the whole chart.

Comparing policies with WELLBYs

We can draw the same kind of comparison for policies in high-income countries based on data from Frayman et al. (2024), Frijters and Krekel (2021), and various reports from State of Life.

Bar chart showing cost per WELLBY for 31 policies. Mental health interventions save more than they cost; policies like Winter Fuel Allowance cost over $100,000 per WELLBY. $104,167 $96,154 $83,333 $65,789 $33,784 $16,447 $12,500 $11,655 $11,250 $10,416 $6,684 $4,296 $3,157 $3,125 $1,590 $1,464 $1,119 $707 $535 $512 $500 $221 $75 $50 $28 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 These policies save more than they cost. Winter Fuel Allowance State Pension Age Rail* LTC* Road building* Placement NICE medicines Tideway Legacy (infrastructure) WTP for health improvement London Olympics R&D Tax Credits Apprentice Guarantee NCS volunteering NHS Marginal More police Hull City of Culture US health insurance Wellbeing in schools Beat the Street (exercise) IAPT therapy (retired) Lottery Wellbeing Programmes Problem-solving training at work Air pollution IAPT therapy (unemployment) Healthy Minds IAPT therapy (average) NHS Talking Therapies Therapy for addiction Employment support for MH MH support in schools Relaxing Green Belt near transit $0 $25,000 $50,000 $75,000 $100,000 $125,000 Cost per WELLBY Evaluator Frayman et al. (2024) Frijters and Krekel (2021) State of Life * Department for Transport analysis (Frayman et al., 2024). LTC: Lower Thames Crossing.

Scroll sideways to see the whole chart.

How are WELLBYs used?

  1. 1970sHealth economists start using QALYs (Quality-Adjusted Life Years) to prioritise healthcare resources, as they still do today (Spencer et al., 2022).
  2. 2019The first wellbeing analysis of charities we know of, in Michael Plant’s Doing Good Badly?
  3. 2021The first analyses explicitly in WELLBYs: by Frijters and Krekel, State of Life, and the Happier Lives Institute, comparing psychotherapy and cash transfers. In July, the UK Treasury publishes wellbeing guidance for its Green Book.
  4. 2022New Zealand’s Treasury publishes guidance on using WELLBYs in its cost-benefit analysis.
  5. 2023An OECD review finds that 37 countries measure the wellbeing of their citizens.
  6. 2024Academics such as the LSE value for money group use WELLBYs to evaluate specific policies, and compare the cost-effectiveness of policies in high-income countries (Frayman et al., 2024).
  7. 2025Our chapter of the World Happiness Report 2025, “Giving to Others”, compares charities by the WELLBYs they create per dollar, drawing on analyses by Krekel and colleagues, Pro Bono Economics, State of Life and our own.
  8. TodayOur Living Review brings together WELLBY cost-effectiveness analyses, and our charity recommendations are built on them.

WELLBYs, summarised

WELLBYs represent a significant step forward in measuring what matters most: how much better off people actually feel. By directly asking people about their wellbeing we can better understand what truly improves lives and make more informed decisions about how to help others effectively.

Whether you are a policymaker, philanthropist, or simply someone interested in making the world better, understanding WELLBYs helps us focus on what really counts – making people’s lives genuinely better in ways they themselves can feel and report.

Before you go, subscribe to our newsletter!

We’ll update you on wellbeing research and how to make the world a happier place.