Saving lives or improving them?
- Home
- Our Publications
- Saving lives or improving them?
Should we fund charities that save lives, or ones that make lives better? The answer depends on how bad you think death is for the person who dies, and on where you put the neutral pointThe life satisfaction score at which a life is neither good nor bad. Read more. Set your own views below and see how the Against Malaria Foundation compares with the charities we evaluate.
This is based on our work in The Elephant in the Bednet (Plant et al., 2022; see also Samuelsson et al., 2023, and Dupret & Plant, 2026, for research on the neutral point), which lays out why philosophy matters when comparing life-extending and life-improving interventions.
HLI does not hold any specific view.
AMF among the charities we evaluate
WELLBYs per $1,000 donated. AMF moves with your views; the others are our estimates. On the right, how AMF compares with each.
AMF under each view on the badness of death, across the neutral point. Everything else stays at your settings; the dotted line is your neutral point.
AMF under each view across the neutral point, against the charities compared (the flat lines).
- Pure Earth (Ghana) 105.43
- Taimaka 66.00
- Reach Up (parenting) 50.12
- Friendship Bench 48.52
- StrongMinds 40.37
- ACTRA 36.64
- Shamiri 32.93
- Fortify Health 21.65
- GiveDirectly 7.55
- 4.95
- 70
- 0.34
- 7.26
- 4.25
- 20.2
- 2.58